My Proportions
your cousin said...
Is your waist really 32? I thought it was 30. Because an inseam of 34 doesn't sound so freakishly long if your waist is 32. I see 32-34 jeans all the time. 30-34 though. That would be something!
Sheldorama said...
Ah, good question. Here's the deal: If I wear a 30' the pants will ride around my actual waist and thus necessitate an even longer length. If I wear a 32-34 with a belt, which is the closest thing that I can find to a reasonable fit, then my pants ride on my hips and only require 34 inches of length. This also keeps me from appearing so high-waisted like so many Cosmo Kramers. I'm actually probably about a 30-35 or 36.
p.s. I'm not getting fat! You are!
Is your waist really 32? I thought it was 30. Because an inseam of 34 doesn't sound so freakishly long if your waist is 32. I see 32-34 jeans all the time. 30-34 though. That would be something!
Sheldorama said...
Ah, good question. Here's the deal: If I wear a 30' the pants will ride around my actual waist and thus necessitate an even longer length. If I wear a 32-34 with a belt, which is the closest thing that I can find to a reasonable fit, then my pants ride on my hips and only require 34 inches of length. This also keeps me from appearing so high-waisted like so many Cosmo Kramers. I'm actually probably about a 30-35 or 36.
p.s. I'm not getting fat! You are!
posted by Sheldorama at 9:37 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home